APPLICATION OF ELECTRONIC DEVICES IN ELECTION PROCEEDINGS IN NIGERIA

Authors

  • Professor Anya Kingsley Anya Doctoral Advisor and Head of Public & International Law Igbinedion University College of Law Okada. https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5549-1852
  • Dr Helen Oriafo Igbinedion University image/svg+xml
  • Barrister Aki Pa-Saviour Amuluku Graduate Candidate Igbinedion University School of Postgraduate Studies & Research

Keywords:

Election proceedings, electronic transmission, electronic devices, judicial intervention, Technological devices

Abstract

The enactment of the Electoral Act 2022 is a welcome development for Nigerians and friends of Nigeria because of one peculiar feature, which is the introduction of electronic transmission of results from the polling units as well as other related provisions, contained therein. The provisions of the Act, which provides for the transmission of results from the polling unit envisaged the collation of results from the polling centers as well as the declaration of the results. It is against this background that the authors critically examined the electronic transmission of results which invariably seek to promote credibility of election matters in Nigeria, and specifically focusing on judicial intervention on the use of electronic devices in the conduct of elections. The authors demonstrated the extent to which electronic devices or technologies applied in the Nigerian electoral process as well as the pronouncement of courts has effected on the regime of use of electronic devices in the conduct of elections. The paper considered the concomitant challenges associated with the application of electronic devices and resultant utilization in the Nigerian electoral process usually in the face of electoral disputes in the courts or tribunal. The paper found that while the courts and tribunals in the course of resolving electoral litigations have faithfully or otherwise, accommodated the use of manual methods together with the use of electronic devices, and by so doing, invariably creating a window for election manipulators to operate in a different dimension. The authors concluded by demonstrating that the electoral umpire, INEC have continued to undertake legal, structural and institutional reforms which are not only supportive of the credible electoral process but also reinforced the efficient performance of the technology used in Nigeria, particularly, such measures aimed at making the use of electronic devices or other relevant technological devices for the electronic transmission of results mandatory through necessary amendments to the Electoral Act 2022.

Author Biographies

Professor Anya Kingsley Anya, Doctoral Advisor and Head of Public & International Law Igbinedion University College of Law Okada.

Doctoral Advisor and Head of Public & International Law Igbinedion University College of Law Okada. He could be contacted at anya.kingsley@iuokada.edu.ng  // editor@kblsp.org.ng  // https://www.anyakingsleyanya.com.ng  // Researchgate.net/anya-kingsley-anya // Academia.edu/anya-kingsley-anya // google scholar/anya-kingsley-anya  //web of science/anya-kingsley-anya  //

https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5549-1852

Dr Helen Oriafo, Igbinedion University

Lecturer Igbinedion University College of Law Okada Edo State. The author could be contacted at oriaifomaranatha@gmail.com // oriaifo.helynn@iuokada.edu.ng

Barrister Aki Pa-Saviour Amuluku , Graduate Candidate Igbinedion University School of Postgraduate Studies & Research

co-author has commenced a doctoral programme

References

A. K. Anya, The Role of Courts in Application and Enforcement of Law in Nigeria,

Vol. 9 (No. 1) (2017) Port Harcourt Law Journal; ResearchGate.com/anyakingsleyanya

Ibid, at P. 2

Ibid, at P. 3

[Hereafter, The INEC]

(as amended)

Available online at www.inecnigeria.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/FINAL

(2010) All FWLR (Pt. 524) p. 117 at 136-137.

(as amended)

INEC Regulations and Guidelines for the Conduct of Elections 2019

Ibid.

Ibid.

Section 153 of the Electoral Act

[Hereafter, The SCR]

Oyetola & anor. v INEC & Ors. (2023) LPELR 60392 (SC) Pp. 18, 20 Paras. (E)–(F)

Supra, at P. 21, Paras. (A)–(F)

Oyetola & anor. v INEC & Ors. (2023) LPELR 60392 (SC) Per Emmanuel A. Agim JSC at Pp. 18 – 20 Paras (A)–(D)

Oyetola & Anor, supra, at paras. (A)-(F)

Oyetola & anor. v INEC & Ors. (2023) LPELR 60392 (SC) Per Emmanuel A. Agim JSC at Pp. 16 –18 Paras (C)–(D)

Supra, at P. 22, para. (A)-(F)

(2019) LPELR-48488(CA)

(as amended)

Abubakar & Anor. v INEC & Ors., Supra

Ibid, Per Samuel Chukwudumebi Oseji, JCA at Pp. 363, 384 (Paras. (A)–(D)

(as amended) supra

Unrep. SC. 907/2016 delivered on 8th January 2016

(2016) 12 NWLR (Pt. 1526) 179 at 237 (E)-(H) to 239 (A) per Nweze JSC

Unrep. judgment of the Court in appeal No. SC.1004/2015 of February 5, 2016

Unrep. Judgement, supra.

Per Mohammed Lawal Garba JCA at Pp. 187, 214 Paras (C )-(E)

Supra, Per Samuel Chukwudumebi Oseji, JCA at Pp. 384, 385 Paras (E)-(F)

(as amended)

Ibid.

(2023) LPELR-60392(SC)

(as amended) supra

Downloads

Published

2024-02-26

How to Cite

Anya, A. K., Oriafo, H. I., & Amuluku , A. P.-S. (2024). APPLICATION OF ELECTRONIC DEVICES IN ELECTION PROCEEDINGS IN NIGERIA. KB Law Scholars Journal, 1(2), 97–111. Retrieved from https://www.kblsp.org.ng/index.php/kblsp/article/view/24